<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cancelling &#8220;Yes or No&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allenpike.com/2008/cancelling-yes-or-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allenpike.com/2008/cancelling-yes-or-no/</link>
	<description>Allen Pike on gidgets and gazmos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tewha.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yes/no</title>
		<link>http://www.allenpike.com/2008/cancelling-yes-or-no/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>tewha.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yes/no</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antipode.ca/?p=305#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>[...] Pike posted on the silliness of Yes/No and OK/Cancel a few days ago. Today, I saw the best example ever of poorly-named buttons. This is pretty typical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pike posted on the silliness of Yes/No and OK/Cancel a few days ago. Today, I saw the best example ever of poorly-named buttons. This is pretty typical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.allenpike.com/2008/cancelling-yes-or-no/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antipode.ca/?p=305#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m impressed, Bruce. You got through a comment on Windodws Yes/No Abort/Retry/Fail insanity without mentioning &quot;(Press Retry to debug.)&quot; in Visual Studio. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m impressed, Bruce. You got through a comment on Windodws Yes/No Abort/Retry/Fail insanity without mentioning &#8220;(Press Retry to debug.)&#8221; in Visual Studio. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.allenpike.com/2008/cancelling-yes-or-no/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antipode.ca/?p=305#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>The problem is at least partly rooted in the APIs, which form the basis of developer&#039;s imagination (APIs are stronger than documentation).  Win32, for example, has a trivial API for message boxes with yes/no, ok/cancel, and abort/retry/ignore.  The APIs gave birth to thousands of unimaginative dialog boxes on the platforms, despite a good recommendation in the platform docs to do otherwise.  Making bad UIs easy is a core part of the problem.

Really, the API writers should expressly disallow horrible dialogs, or make it easier to make good ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is at least partly rooted in the APIs, which form the basis of developer&#8217;s imagination (APIs are stronger than documentation).  Win32, for example, has a trivial API for message boxes with yes/no, ok/cancel, and abort/retry/ignore.  The APIs gave birth to thousands of unimaginative dialog boxes on the platforms, despite a good recommendation in the platform docs to do otherwise.  Making bad UIs easy is a core part of the problem.</p>
<p>Really, the API writers should expressly disallow horrible dialogs, or make it easier to make good ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

